Instrumententafel Angst & Gier Bergbaubecken Geldbörsen Wörterbuch Werben Facebook Twitter
Marktkapitalisierung:
24h Vol:
Kryptowährungen: 16063
Märkte: 113756
CoinsValue.net logo CoinsValue.net logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
16063
Kryptowährungen
58.9%
Bitcoin Aktie
NewsBTC 2026-04-16 21:57:27

Circle (CRCL) Sued Over $280M Drift Protocol Hack—What Plaintiffs Claim

Circle (CRCL) Sued Over $280M Drift Protocol Hack—What Plaintiffs Claim

Circle (CRCL), the issuer behind the USDC stablecoin, is facing a fresh lawsuit in Massachusetts tied to the $280 million Drift Protocol hack that occurred on April 1. The complaint, filed by plaintiffs represented by the law firm Gibbs Mura, alleges that Circle did not take action to freeze stolen funds even though it had both the technical ability and contractual authority to do so. Drift Hack Fallout According to the lawsuit, attackers drained an estimated $280–$285 million from the Solana-based exchange in less than 12 minutes. The stolen assets were then moved from Solana to Ethereum over the course of roughly eight hours using Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP). Related Reading: Could Bitcoin Hit $90,000 And Trigger A New Altcoin Rally? Expert Cites 6 Major Catalysts The transfer allegedly took place during US business hours, a detail plaintiffs highlight to emphasize that the alleged movement and conversion of funds occurred while the matter was ongoing, without intervention from Circle to freeze the assets. The filing further claims that user funds were pulled from multiple parts of Drift’s platform, including trading, lending, and vault deposits. As the breach unfolded, Drift’s total value locked reportedly fell sharply from about $550 million to under $250 million. In response to the incident, deposits and withdrawals were suspended indefinitely. The impact, plaintiffs say, extended beyond Drift itself: at least 20 other DeFi protocols reported indirect losses related to exposure to Drift. Circle Accused Of Not Freezing Assets The plaintiffs also point to a separate earlier civil matter involving Circle. Nine days before the Drift-related lawsuit, Circle reportedly froze 16 unrelated business wallets. That, according to the plaintiffs, demonstrates that Circle has the capability—and, in that instance, the willingness—to freeze funds when it deems it appropriate. However, the lawsuit alleges that Circle failed to freeze the stolen USDC and other assets that were allegedly converted into USDC after the hack. Related Reading: Bitcoin Policy Institute Maps Out Strategy For US Stablecoin Supremacy Across 5 Policy Areas Circle is accused of using its Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol in a way that plaintiffs say allowed attackers to offload up to $230 million onto the Ethereum blockchain. In the lawsuit’s framing, this is central to why the plaintiffs believe Circle should have acted to prevent the transfers of stolen stablecoins and connected assets during the time the funds were being moved. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Meist gelesene Nachrichten

Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
58.9%
Bitcoin Aktie
0
Heute Nachrichten
Lesen Sie den Haftungsausschluss : Alle hierin bereitgestellten Inhalte unserer Website, Hyperlinks, zugehörige Anwendungen, Foren, Blogs, Social-Media-Konten und andere Plattformen („Website“) dienen ausschließlich Ihrer allgemeinen Information und werden aus Quellen Dritter bezogen. Wir geben keinerlei Garantien in Bezug auf unseren Inhalt, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Genauigkeit und Aktualität. Kein Teil der Inhalte, die wir zur Verfügung stellen, stellt Finanzberatung, Rechtsberatung oder eine andere Form der Beratung dar, die für Ihr spezifisches Vertrauen zu irgendeinem Zweck bestimmt ist. Die Verwendung oder das Vertrauen in unsere Inhalte erfolgt ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko und Ermessen. Sie sollten Ihre eigenen Untersuchungen durchführen, unsere Inhalte prüfen, analysieren und überprüfen, bevor Sie sich darauf verlassen. Der Handel ist eine sehr riskante Aktivität, die zu erheblichen Verlusten führen kann. Konsultieren Sie daher Ihren Finanzberater, bevor Sie eine Entscheidung treffen. Kein Inhalt unserer Website ist als Aufforderung oder Angebot zu verstehen