Casa Paura e avidità Piscine minerarie Portafogli Dizionario pubblicizzare Facebook Twitter
Mercato:
24h Vol:
Cryptocurrencies: 16063
Mercata: 110498
CoinsValue.net logo CoinsValue.net logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
Mercato
24h Vol
16063
Cryptocurrencies
57.02%
Bitcoin Condividere
CoinDesk 2025-07-02 21:25:11

NY Bankruptcy Judge Gives Celsius the Green Light to Pursue $4.3B Lawsuit Against Tether

NY Bankruptcy Judge Gives Celsius the Green Light to Pursue $4.3B Lawsuit Against Tether

A New York bankruptcy court has given Celsius the go-ahead to pursue the bulk of its $4 billion lawsuit against stablecoin issuer Tether, according to a recent court filing . The bankrupt crypto lender filed suit against Tether last year, alleging that Tether improperly liquidated nearly 40,000 bitcoins — worth over $4.3 billion at today’s prices — that it was holding as loan collateral in June 2022, shortly before Celsius halted withdrawals. In their suit, Celsius’ lawyers argued that Tether didn’t give Celsius enough time to satisfy its collateral demands, which they claimed it had “sufficient Bitcoin on its balance sheet” to do so “given that Celsius had instituted a ‘pause’ on customer withdrawals … resulting in the retention of, and access to, a significant amount of Bitcoin.” “If Celsius had been given the opportunity to meet the collateral demand — which it had a contractual right to do — it could have been able to avoid the disposition of its Bitcoin at near the bottom of the cryptocurrency market,” Celsius’ lawyers wrote. “Instead, that disposition was carried out for the benefit of just one creditor: Tether.” At the time the suit was filed, Tether pledged to fight it , calling the suit “baseless” and a “shameless litigation money grab” in a press statement. Tether claimed that Celsius executives directed the liquidation of its BTC collateral held by Tether in “in order to close out its roughly 815 million USDT position” with the company. Read more: Tether to Fight Celsius’ $3.3 Billion ‘Shakedown’ Litigation “Rather than recognize the clear validity of the agreement entered into years before Celsius’ bankruptcy, this lawsuit seeks to improperly impose the costs of Celsius’ mismanagement and failure on Tether,” the company’s statement said. However, the judge overseeing the case disagreed with Tether, arguing in his Monday order that Celsius’ then-CEO Alex Mashinsky’s — who was sentenced to 12 years in prison for fraud in May — ”alleged oral permission” given to Tether to liquidate Celsius’ bitcoin collateral was “insufficient” and that not giving Celsius the 10-hour window to post collateral allotted by the two firms’ contract could still be a breach of contract, verbal permission or not. In his June 30th order, Chief Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) granted threw out only one count of the amended complaint, Count 4, which alleged that Tether breached the “covenant of good faith and fair dealing” under British Virgin Islands law. For that count, Glenn decided to dismiss it without prejudice, giving Celsius’ lawyers the opportunity to amend it with “facts sufficient to bring themselves within the requirements of BVI law.”

La maggior parte ha letto le notizie

Mercato
24h Vol
57.02%
Bitcoin Condividere
0
Oggi notizie
Leggi la dichiarazione di non responsabilità : Tutti i contenuti forniti nel nostro sito Web, i siti con collegamento ipertestuale, le applicazioni associate, i forum, i blog, gli account dei social media e altre piattaforme ("Sito") sono solo per le vostre informazioni generali, procurati da fonti di terze parti. Non rilasciamo alcuna garanzia di alcun tipo in relazione al nostro contenuto, incluso ma non limitato a accuratezza e aggiornamento. Nessuna parte del contenuto che forniamo costituisce consulenza finanziaria, consulenza legale o qualsiasi altra forma di consulenza intesa per la vostra specifica dipendenza per qualsiasi scopo. Qualsiasi uso o affidamento sui nostri contenuti è esclusivamente a proprio rischio e discrezione. Devi condurre la tua ricerca, rivedere, analizzare e verificare i nostri contenuti prima di fare affidamento su di essi. Il trading è un'attività altamente rischiosa che può portare a perdite importanti, pertanto si prega di consultare il proprio consulente finanziario prima di prendere qualsiasi decisione. Nessun contenuto sul nostro sito è pensato per essere una sollecitazione o un'offerta